Class Action
Suit Filed Against Bank of
401(k) Plan Participants Claim Violation
of Fiduciary Duty over Merrill Lynch Purchase
Bank of America announced its acquisition of Merrill
Lynch on Sept. 15, 2008. In the four
quarters prior to the announcement, Merrill Lynch reported losses totaling $17
billion. The suit alleges that based on
Merrill Lynch’s financial condition, the defendants should have investigated
whether Bank of America stock was a prudent retirement plan investment.
The complaint alleges that “a reasonably prudent
fiduciary would have, at the very least, examined whether Bank of America stock
was a good investment for the plan, particularly given that the Bank of America
Stock Fund represented a huge percentage, if not the majority, of the
retirement plan’s assets. A simple plan
review would have uncovered uncertainty about the true scope of Merrill Lynch’s
liabilities. Instead this fiduciary duty
was neglected, and the retirement plan lost billions.”
On Oct. 10, 2008, the record
date under the proxy statement, Bank of America stock closed at $20.41. By
The suit also claims the defendants failed to correct
misleading communications to plan participants.
In November 2008, Bank of America delivered proxy materials to
participants and other shareholders describing the Merrill Lynch
acquisition. The materials instructed
participants to rely only on the information contained therein or incorporated
by reference; yet they failed to disclose the risk factors and massive
liabilities and losses attributable to Merrill Lynch, which were ultimately
revealed in January 2009. The proxy
materials also failed to disclose that Merrill Lynch’s assets were too illiquid
and complex to value with any degree of certainty and vastly understated the
financial institution’s liabilities.
Further and despite the defendant’s knowledge of mounting Merrill Lynch
losses in the fourth quarter, this information was not disclosed to the plan’s
participants prior to the shareholder vote on the acquisition.
The plaintiffs are
represented by Garrett Wotkyns of Schneider Wallace Cottrell
Brayton Konecky LLP and
Schneider
Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP
represents workers and consumers in class action litigation matters around the
country. For 15 years, the firm’s
attorneys have handled matters involving workplace benefits, disability rights,
employment discrimination issues and consumer rights. On the Web:
www.schneiderwallace.com
Bailey
& Glasser LLP represents employees and consumers in complex national and
state class actions in federal and state courts across the country. The attorneys at Bailey & Glasser have
litigated many class actions on behalf of consumers and employees and tried
many cases to a successful jury verdict.
On the Web: www.baileyglasser.com