Furthering The Civil Rights Movement And Fighting Pregnancy Leave Discrimination With Individual And Class Action Litigation
Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP

 

Women and Minority Employees Charge Best Buy with Employment Discrimination in Federal Court; Class Action Lawsuit Filed against National Electronics Retailer that Tells Women Employees, ‘Girls Can't Sell’

San Francisco, CA --- December 8, 2005--In the midst of its heaviest sales season of the year, Best Buy, a multi-billion dollar national electronics chain, is being charged with violating federal and state laws against race and sex discrimination in employment.

Claiming that women and minorities, specifically African Americans and Latinos, are paid less than white males, denied promotions, and assigned to less desirable positions, current and former employees of Best Buy today (December 8, 2005) filed a federal class action civil rights lawsuit, Holloway et al. v. Best Buy Co, Inc., this morning in U. S. District Court in San Francisco. Plaintiffs are represented by attorneys from Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP and Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP.

"Best Buy is touting its modern, high-tech products for customers this holiday season. The company's views of women and minority employees, however, remain outdated and obsolete," said attorney Bill Lann Lee of Lieff Cabraser. Lee is the former Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights in the U.S. Department of Justice.

"This company operates through a corporate culture of racial and gender stereotypes," stated Todd Schneider of Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP. "Best Buy enforces a nationwide policy that results in the preference of white male employees in hiring and for desirable job assignments. The low number of women and minorities employed by Best Buy sets it apart from other large retailers."

As an example of the corporate culture of stereotyping, the lawsuit describes how Best Buy's policy of "segmentation" requires managers and salespeople to target one of four composite customer types, all white, and only one female. These are: "Barry," a male with a six-figure income who purchases what he wants regardless of cost; "Ray," a male who likes electronic gadgets but may not always be able to afford what he wants; or "Buzz," a young male interested in gaming and playstations who makes small purchases. The only female customer to whom Best Buy markets confirms gender stereotypes: "Jill" is "Barry's" wife -- a stay-at-home soccer mom.

Vallejo resident Jasmen Holloway, 22, worked at the Marin City Best Buy from January 2001 until August 2005. "After I had worked there for more than four years, I was interviewed for a promotion and requested a pay increase. The promotion was given to a white man with less experience than me. I was refused the raise because they said that I had reached the maximum salary cap for my position -- but I later learned that less experienced, white male employees with fewer qualifications were paid more than I was."

"I was angry at the way that I and other minorities in the store were treated," added Holloway, who is African American. "When I complained to the human resources department, they did nothing -- so I filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission."

Cheryl Chappel, 40, currently an Administrative Senior at the Mira Mesa Best Buy, was passed over for promotion in favor of a part-time male employee, despite Chappel's excellent performance reviews and more extensive experience. Best Buy managers told her she was not promoted to operations supervisor because it was "a man thing," and that there were few women on the sales floor because "girls can't sell."

Chappel, who has also worked at the Best Buy in Chico, was consistently paid less than male employees in comparable positions at both sites. When she realized this was a pattern for women employees, she filed a charge against Best Buy with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

Additional plaintiffs include another woman from the Chico store and three African American male employees from the Marin City store who were paid less, denied promotions, assigned fewer scheduled hours and received unequal job assignments and unequal training opportunities than white males. The men were refused sales jobs, even though they had prior experience in cell phone and electronics sales. One African American employee was awarded store MVP, yet nevertheless received lower pay than white employees in comparable jobs.

The lawsuit charges that Best Buy recruits, hires and maintains a disproportionately white and male sales force from which it then promotes a disproportionately white male management force. Nationwide, more than 80% of store managers, the top job in a store, are white men, less than 10% are women, and less than 10% are African-American or Latino. "Qualified women and minority applicants are turned away," charged Lee, "and even when the company does hire them, it generally does not permit them to work on the sales floor -- the pathway to promotion. Rather they are segregated to the stock room, cashier stations, and minor sales positions."

"Our plaintiffs' experiences are not isolated examples of employment practices or individual decisions," added attorney Schneider. "On the contrary, they are representative of Best Buy's systematic discrimination against women, African Americans and Latinos."

The lawsuit charges that Best Buy is violating federal and state civil rights laws prohibiting employment discrimination based on race or gender. The suit is seeking an injunction against Best Buy's discriminatory practices and the institution of company programs to ensure equal employment opportunities for women and people of color. In addition, the suit is seeking back pay for all plaintiffs.

Best Buy Company, Inc., a Minnesota-based corporation specializing in consumer electronics, operates 679 retail stores throughout the United States and has approximately 107,000 employees. Over 10% of its stores are in California. Its revenue in 2005 totaled $27.4 billion.

    News

Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP announces a $19.75 Million settlement of Tong v. CVS.  The case involves claims by CVS’ Pharmacist employees regarding unpaid meal breaks, rest breaks and overtime.  For more information click here

 

Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP wins an historic $100 million judgment against San Francisco Unified School District in landmark disability access case on behalf of all disabled students of San Francisco Unified School District. <more...>

 

Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP announces a $54.9 Million Settlement in FedEx Race Discrimination Class Action <more...>

 

Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP announces a $10.6  million settlement in a class action alleging that Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory discriminated against its 3,200 female employees in pay and promotions  <more...>

 

Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP announces a $9 Million Settlement in a wage and hour class action against Kaiser <more...>

 

Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP secures a $5.8 million settlement in  national class action alleging UPS discriminates against deaf employees <more...>

 

Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP announces a $5.3 million verdict in a state-wide class action against Costco <more....>

 

Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP files a class action against eHarmony for its refusal to offer matching services to gay and lesbian users <more...>

 

Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP announces landmark victory on behalf of learning-disabled MCAT test takers

 

Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP announces the filing of a nation-wide employment discrimination class action against Best Buy on behalf of all African American, Latino and female employees. <more...>

 

Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP wins victory in a landmark trial of class action employment case against UPS <more...>

 

For information about the recent Stipulated Judgment entered in the City College of San Francisco class action on behalf of all disabled students, click here

 

Federal Judge certifies first ever race discrimination class action against FedEx and names Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP class counsel.  <more...>

 

Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP files national class action against Sears for failure to pay wages <more...>

 

Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP congratulates Todd Schneider who was named the 2005 Trial Lawyer of the Year by the San Francisco Trial Lawyer's Association

 

Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP congratulates Todd Schneider who was honored as a Super Lawyer by San Francisco Magazine for a third straight year in 2004 - 2006.

 

Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP congratulates Todd Schneider who was a finalist for the Consumer Attorneys of California's 2006 Consumer Attorney of the Year Award

 

For information about the settlement in the Elkin v. Six Flags, Inc. class action on behalf of hourly employees in California, click here (5 megabyte download).

 

 

    Investigations

 

bullet Quickly Restaurants

 

bulletPharmaceutical Drug Reps Denied Overtime Compensation

 

bulletFailure to Pay Wages

 

bulletCVS and Sav-On Pharmacists

 

bulletDisability Access (ADA)

 

bulletConsumer Fraud

 

bulletDangerous Drugs

 

bulletAccess to Education

 

bulletDeaf Rights

 

bulletSerzone

 

bullet Guidant Defibrillators

 

bulletWelder's Disease/Manganism

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94104
Tel: (415) 421-7100

Toll Free: (800) 689-0024
Fax: (415) 421-7105
TTY: (415) 421-1655

Email:  info@schneiderwallace.com
 

Class Action Home

Here are links to more information about our practice areas:
Discrimination  Overtime  Vioxx  Class Action Practice Areas


 

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided at this web site is advertising material and is for general information purposes only. The material on this site does not constitute legal advice or opinion. DO NOT act upon this information without first consulting an attorney. No Attorney-Client relationship is formed unless agreed to in writing. By using this site you agree that you have read our Disclaimer and agree to our Terms of Use


© Copyright 2002-2007, Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP
All Rights Reserved Worldwide

 

 

Schneider Wallace Cottrell Brayton Konecky LLP is a dedicated group of California trial lawyers committed to continuing the work of the civil rights movement through individual and class action litigation. For over a decade, our attorneys have handled matters in the areas of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) discrimination, class action lawsuits, employment discrimination, pregnancy discrimination, and class action litigation regarding dangerous drugs including Vioxx.